23.07.2021

The perils and potential of micro-credentials for ALE

Micro-credentials have the potential to be a tool that can boost access and participation to lifelong learning. They might even attract a larger and more diverse number of learners. However, they also bear certain risks that need to be taken into consideration.

The Open Consultation on Micro-Credentials, launched by the European Commission, was open until 13 July.

Read the full statement of EAEA: The perils and potential of micro-credentials for ALE (pdf)

Summary of EAEA’s statement

  • Micro-credentials could pave the way for more inclusive education and training offers and could be a relevant form of qualification in particular for learners who cannot access other types of qualifications, such as migrants and refugees. Micro-credentials could be an encouraging way to boost confidence and further steps.
  • EAEA regrets seeing no mention of disadvantaged groups in the Final report: A European approach to micro-credentials.
  • Micro-credentials can be a solution to reducing socioeconomic inequalities in education and training across the EU but should not replace full study programmes (thus full qualifications) and measures to ensure equal access to these.
  • Micro-credentials should be extended to non-formal education providers.
  • Care should be taken when approaching quality assurance (QA) standards as often these are far too rigid for non-formal education providers, especially in non-formal adult education. QA standards should be moved towards learner-centred processes.
  • Civil society organisations active in education and training, should meaningfully be involved and consulted in the design and implementation of the European micro-credential approach.

It is imperative that the European framework embraces micro-credentials not only to fulfill employment and labour market needs but also to take into account learners’ personal development and fulfillment, and stringent conditions should apply to private providers accordingly. Micro-credentials could potentially disrupt the governance system in which education systems operate (particularly public institutions), thus comprehensive guidance should be provided to the Member States to develop a system prioritising public offers and having learners’ needs at the centre.

Micro-credentials must neither lead to a two-class system of provision (one for credentials, the other non-formal) which only recognises and values formal and formalised learning. Additionally, the decision to use micro-credentials as validation processes should always remain a choice for the learner. If they want to follow their learning pathways in a completely non-formal way, they should be able to do so, and such an informal path should not be less valued than a formal one.

More information

Gina Ebner
e-mail: gina.ebner(at)eaea.org

28.11.2022 advocacy

A wider access to Erasmus+ programme is needed in Eastern Europe

EAEA urges the EU to offer more opportunities for participation of Eastern European non-EU countries in the Erasmus+ programme.

28.11.2022 advocacy

2022 - a year that will shape the adult learning and education of the future?

2022 has, so far, been a very eventful year for adult learning and education at the European and international levels. Together with civil society partners, EAEA has been bringing the voice of adult learners into the discussions and negotiations on several key adult learning policies.

18.11.2022 access

Call for urgent action to mitigate the impact of the energy crisis and inflation on ALE provision

European adult learning and education organisations are ringing the alarm bell: the energy crisis and inflation in Europe are spreading far and wide and are starting to show their negative impact on the adult learning and education (ALE) sector. EAEA calls for urgent action to mitigate the impact of the energy crisis and inflation on ALE provision and to ensure access to learning opportunities for all adults.